The Law is an ass when it comes to Disclosing and Barring Service checks for Councillors

I will begin by stating the Law is an ass when it comes to Disclosing and Barring Service checks for Councillors. I say this because the changes in legislation introduced by the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 make it very difficult for a Council to carry out Standard and Enhanced DBS on its elected Members.

I repeated these words at today’s Constitution and Governance Committee where the issue of DBSing Members was discussed.

Under this legislation there was a change in the definition of regulated activity which means it is now restricted to undertaking prescribed activities with children, young people or vulnerable adults during which time the child, young person or vulnerable adult might be considered to be more vulnerable to abuse. This means that only those Members who are deemed to carry out this regulated activity can be subject to enhanced DBS checks.

Without DBS checks, it is very difficult for a member of the public to know if a Councillor poses a risk to children and vulnerable adults. In our role as Councillors, we do get invited to people’s homes to discuss local issues and these homes can contain children and vulnerable adults. Therefore, I believe the public – as far as we can – must have confidence that the Councillor does not pose a risk.

The fact is every councillor is responsible for upholding the Council’s reputation for protecting adults and children from harm. I firmly believe it is not appropriate for councillors who have been investigated and found to be a risk; or cautioned; or convicted of involvement in harming adults or children, to be a Councillor and represent the community.

A basic DBS check can be carried out under the 2012 Act , but this check only lists any unspent convictions. Basic Certificates are available for all Members and co-optees, without further eligibility criteria.

You would think if a Councillor served on any of the following committees: Council, Adult Care Policy Advisory Committee, Young People Policy Advisory Committee, Scrutiny Management Committee, Health and Social Care Scrutiny Committee, Health and Wellbeing Board, School Admission and Exclusions Appeals Panel and Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust/Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust they would need to have a standard or enhanced DBS check. But they do not!

The only Committee which requires a standard or enhanced check are: Cabinet, Children in Care Education Support Service Governing Body, Adult Education Board of Governors and Appeals Committee.

The legislation does not allow a Councillor to voluntarily have an enhanced DBS check either!

Without having the ability to do enhanced DBS checks, I believe we are undermining child protection. What’s worse even if someone does have adverse history on their DBS check, the Council is still at a disadvantage as the changes to the Standards Board of England means there is no way of removing that Councillor from office. Another crazy change in legislation.

I feel strongly we need a change in Government legislation to allow local councils to carry out standard or enhanced DBS’ checks on all its Members.

Getting back to today’s meeting, the Committee Members did recommend to Full Council – who will make the final decision – that all Cornwall Councillors should have at least the basic DBS, with those who are eligible under the set criteria having the enhanced check.

This may not be perfect – but it is better than not having any checks at all for the whole membership. And yes, I have had an enhanced check.

To read the full report discussed today, click HERE








  • Gill Zella Martin

    I had enhanced DBS checks for working with vulnerable adults and children, for voluntary driving, however, I think the system is not foolproof. There is nothing to say that anyone cleared by these checks would not offend after the check. Therefore, in my opinion they should be repeated at regular intervals.
    I think greater emphasis though should be put on general awareness of colleagues/anyone involved with children/vulnerable adults, and their actions, also the encouragement of reporting of any suspicions. Knowing the signs and what to look for in abuse of any kind, I think should be all part of any role that involves being in contact with children and vulnerable adults.

  • Gill Zella Martin

    As for the lack of government legislation enabling the council to remove any councillor from office, that is why Andrew George lost my vote at the last election. When I contacted him over the issue he evaded my point and refused to acknowledge the problem, and yet he was part of a government that promoted the safeguarding of children!

  • Pingback: Cornwall Council approves ‘basic’ DBS checks for councillors | Cllr Andrew Wallis

Please feel free to leave a comment to the post, as I like to hear your views! However, comments that do not meet the rules of the site (found in Blog Disclaimer) will not be published. Furthermore, all comment need to be approved by admin before publication.